The topic arose since a new person was pretty recently recruited into my department, so far he seems smart, has experience and is a reasonable person, but I was against the recruitment from the beginning. Not because of any issues with him, his experience or personality, more due to the lack of value versus benefit of recruiting another person into my department. In the end I relented and agreed to have him hired under the condition that I didn't have to look after him and train him, so he is reporting to one of my team members.
Just recently in a conversation with Luke from my former company, I explained the situation to him and the conversation went something like this, as always, please feel free to act out the scene with a pet, colleague or casual sex partner:
Mr. Salaryman: So he's basically reporting to one of my peons.
Luke: Oh, so you're not his direct boss?
Mr. Salaryman: Yeah, that's right.
Luke: (Triumphantly) So that means that he's your grand-peon!
"Grand-peon". Let that new word sink in a bit. This one needs to get in the dictionaries ASAP!
4 comments:
Can I please become your great grand peon someday?
I am peon-less...
Don't be envious, having peons is just a hassle... Would be nice to de-peonize myself.
Why do they hire people just for the sake of hiring? Or DO they... maybe that grand-peon is actually the son of a connection? nepotism...
Post a Comment